25). The citizen in Bakhtin if of the one through the interaction, and its immediate, social context if reproduces in its speaks and practical, in dialgico character. In Marxism and Philosophy of the Language, (2004, P. 113), Bakhtin standes out that ' ' the more immediate social situation and ampler the social environment determine completely and so to speak from its proper interior structure of enunciao' '. One understands that the situation is that of the form the articulation and the participants of the moment are who determine the 0ccasional form and the style of the articulation. The articulation, for being of historical and social nature, is on the previous and posterior articulations, what it generates new speeches. In this manner, the speeches in accordance with vary the social status and the interaction that the citizens establish between itself.
Interaction is in constant of groups, that if it organizes around of activities human beings, that if materializes the signs, that are composites for a duplicity of directions, being differentiated from the value that each citizen occupies. Ahead of such affirmations, we can observe that it is through the language in the verbal interaction that the world if communicates, that it is ahead of the other and the others that the statements are pronounced. As Bakhtin (apud, BRAIT, 2007, P. 1994), ' ' the polifonia if defines for the convivncia and the interaction, in one same space of articulation, of a multiplicity of voices and independent consciences and imiscveis' '. In the bakhtiniana perspective, the speech is constituted of the dialgicas relations, as one palco of fights and ideologies. Bakhtin conceives the discursivo statement as a place of dialogues where voices if cross. Being the diversified language socially, these voices can create controversies or complete a speech or bring answers one the others. Then, the polifonia occurs as resultant of the plurality of social voices in the speech.